asymptotic term造句

• This when expressed in asymptotic terms, gives us an error probability of 2 ^ {-\ Omega ( \ gamma N ) }.
• This means that the remaining part of the partial fraction expansion must eliminate the asymptotic terms for large y coming from-\ frac { 1 } { y + 1 } that decay less fast for large y.
• This striking formula is one of the so-called explicit formulas of number theory, and is already suggestive of the result we wish to prove, since the term ( claimed to be the correct asymptotic order of ) appears on the right-hand side, followed by ( presumably ) lower-order asymptotic terms.
• What I actually have is an operator G whose asymptotic expansion has M as its first term ( as I mentioned above, the f is oscillatory and decreasing; I'm trying to nail down the details now ) . ( My operator G is bounded, I presume my asymptotic term must be also . ).